Usually cheaper clicks
Thinner competition often means a lower cost per acquisition.
Almost every advertiser runs Google and stops there. Microsoft's network is smaller, but the competition is thinner, clicks are usually cheaper, and the audience skews older, wealthier and more desktop-based — which for some businesses is exactly the buyer.
Usually for reasons that are either outdated or simply untested.
It is the default search engine on Windows and Edge, powers Yahoo and DuckDuckGo results, and sits inside Copilot. Plenty of buyers use it without ever choosing it.
The import tool is genuinely useful, but campaigns copied across untouched inherit Google's bid strategies and negatives without any adjustment for a different audience and auction.
Microsoft will always deliver less traffic. The question is whether the traffic it does deliver converts at a lower cost — and for many B2B and finance advertisers it does.
The most common reason of all. A small test budget answers the question in a few weeks; most accounts never run one.
We start with the Google import because it saves days of setup — then immediately rework it. Bid strategies, negative lists, device modifiers and audience targeting all need adjusting for a different competitive landscape and a different user base.
Microsoft's audience targeting is genuinely strong, particularly LinkedIn profile targeting by company, industry and job function — something Google search simply cannot do. For B2B advertisers that alone can justify the channel.
Thinner competition often means a lower cost per acquisition.
Default search on Windows and Edge, plus Yahoo and DuckDuckGo.
LinkedIn profile data layered onto search intent.
Import from Google means testing costs days, not weeks.
Traffic Google was never going to serve you anyway.
Microsoft's ad inventory extends into its AI search surfaces.
Whether your audience and sector justify the channel. We will say if not.
Google campaigns imported, then bids, negatives and targeting reworked.
UET tag implemented and conversions verified before optimization begins.
LinkedIn profile targeting applied where B2B relevance justifies it.
A defined budget and period to produce a clear answer on viability.
Scale if the cost per acquisition beats your benchmark; stop if it does not.
Every engagement is scoped individually. These ranges give you a realistic idea of investment before you speak to us.
Prices are in USD and indicative starting points for scoping — final quotes depend on scope, competition and current site condition. [Confirm or edit these figures before launch.]
Project slots are ready for real client work — screenshots, brand names and outcomes drop straight into these cards.
Replace with cost per lead versus Google.
Replace with the targeting used and result.
Replace with the before/after after adaptation.
It depends entirely on your audience. For B2B, finance, insurance and professional services with older, desktop-heavy buyers, it frequently delivers a lower cost per acquisition than Google. For young consumer audiences it usually does not. A small test answers it in weeks.
Substantially less — Microsoft's search share is a fraction of Google's in most markets. That is the wrong comparison though. The question is whether the traffic converts more cheaply, not whether there is more of it.
You can, and we do — but importing is the start, not the end. Copies that keep Google's bid strategies, negatives and device modifiers usually underperform because the auction and the audience are different.
LinkedIn profile targeting — you can layer company, industry and job function onto search campaigns. No other search platform offers that, and for B2B it can be the whole reason to run the channel.
Microsoft has been extending ad inventory into its AI search experiences. Placement and formats keep changing, so we will not make specific promises about it, but the channel does give you exposure there that Google Ads does not.
Usually a few hundred dollars a month over three months is enough to see whether cost per acquisition beats your Google benchmark. It is a cheap question to answer.
Tell us who your buyers are. We will tell you honestly whether Microsoft Advertising is likely to work for your business before you spend anything on finding out.
No obligation. If we are not the right fit for your goals, we will say so.